|
CORE VITRECTOMY and FLOATERS |
DETAILS and COMMENTS |
I am 60+, no cataracts yet, never had eye surgery, and no other eye issues. In the Fall of 2024 I had a PVD in each eye resulting in two large central floaters, making my life miserable. Rather than ‘live with it’ I decided to take back control of my sight. So 7 months later I approached a highly respected hospital near me about a Floater-Only Vitrectomy (FOV). They regularly perform Fulls but I don’t think anyone had ever approached them formally about getting one done only for floaters. Surprisingly, they were open minded and actually discussed my request internally, but said no. They weren’t worried about causing cataracts or the procedure's effectiveness, but felt the risk of retinal detachment was too high for “just floaters”. In other words, they didn’t like the risk/benefit ratio. Next, I approached a progressive eye center in my area which refreshingly didn't agree with the Full Vitrectomy for everything mindset that is common in the field.
It was estimated that being in my early 60s cataracts were likely to appear naturally in 5 years. Getting a Core might reduce that to 2-3 years. I decided the 2% risk of retinal detachment was acceptable to me.
I reminded myself of the common tactic used by the Opto world to scare people away from a FOV: that it can accelerate cataracts. Well, the average age of cataracts is 65 and the risk of them forming is not worrisome to me. My attitude that I would much rather have floater-free vision and the possibilty of a cataract, than floaters for life with the possibility of a cataract. People who use RLE to get rid of glasses and contacts don't have the same anxiety about lens replacement, which is worth noting. Armed with this new knowledge I began seriously considering an FOV.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Datsunzgarage.us © 1997-2026
All comments are anecdotal only. This is not medical advice.
Datsun is a registered trademark of Nissan®